Nexttech

Nexttech
Creating Generational Legacies

Friday, September 9, 2016

8 ways to break down the wall of a beourocratic mindset and become agile

Hi David


Thanks for these interesting insights, which resonate with me.
A few points.


"the principles of agile - it’s very hard to disagree with them as desirable outcomes."
It may be very hard, but many managers do disagree. They look at the diagram of the Agile network (picture #4) and see a nightmare.

For instance, at one of the sessions at the McKinsey Global Agility Hackathon, after a fairly good presentation of an Agile organization, the McKinsey partner said, "That sounds like having a triple root canal operation."
So it will take quite a few bankruptcies of big firms before there is more general acceptance.
On the meaning of mindset, I agree with you idea that it is like an onion with the different layers. In the Learning Consortium and elsewhere, we see managers have "got" the Law of the Small Team, but not the Law of the Customer or the Law of the Networks.  We also see managers who have "got it" for the team, but not for the organization or as a view as to how the world works. And so on.
On the acquisition of an Agile mindset, we hope to shed some light on that in the Learning Consortium report to be issued next month. Some hypotheses include:

- it's easier if you can start with the young and less experienced (like the military boot camp). For someone with 15+ years experience being successful in a bureaucracy, it's much more difficult.

- training by itself is not enough. It's an experiential thing.

- the pace of change varies greatly from individual to individual. Some get it very quickly. Some, probably never. And everything in between.

- the environment plays a huge influence. In an Agile environment, it's hard not to be Agile and survive. In a bureaucratic environment, it's the opposite.

- it's neither top-down or bottom-up. You need both top-down and bottom-up.

- peer-to-peer learning works better than top-down instruction.

- it's more difficult to achieve Agile mindsets in the back-office functions.

​- the war is never won: even in strongly Agile firms, it's takes constant effort to prevent backsliding, at a time when most of the rest of the world is strongly bureaucratic. New external recruits at a high level in the organization (e.g. a new, externally-recruited CMO, CFO or head of HR) represent a particular risk.

Thoughts? 

Can a beaurocracy organisation have an agile mindset?

What is an agile organisation? 
Apparently everything that a good organisation should be.....

- Nimble 
- self-organizing teams 
- Customer focussed 
- work is done in an iterative fashion with continuous interaction with users almost in real time. 
- teams work on a common cadence, many teams can work together on large complex challenges in a coordinated fashion. 
- Working smarter not harder
- Continuous collaboration among internal silos 
- Ability to take opportunities in market place as they emerge 
- What it's not - Unwieldy clunky slow unfriendly, set in ways, focussed on internal processes

There are 3 Laws of Agile - writes Steve Denning from Forbes - 
www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2016/09/08/explaining-agile/

1. The law of the small team - if you can't feed them on a pizza and a few beers on a Friday night it's too big! Characteristics of Trust, face to face , performance, nimble 
2. The law of the customer 
3. The law of the network - this is the lynchpin of agile - the organisation is fluid and transparent network of players that are collaborating towards a common goal of delighting customers. The organization is an organic living network of high-performance teams. 

The organization operates with an interactive communication dynamic, both horizontally and vertically, writes Denning. Anyone can talk to anyone. Ideas can come from anywhere, including customers. As a network, the organization becomes a growing, learning, adapting living organism that is in constant flux to exploit new opportunities and add new value for customers.

He cites Spotify and Barclays as proponents of agile 
- Spotify to provide personalized music playlists to over a hundred million users every week, 
- Barclays to start becoming an Agile bank that can provide easy, quick, convenient, personalized banking at scale, 
- After listening to Pip Marlow yesterday , it has enabled  Microsoft to still be relevant in a rapidly changing world .

So - can Agile be embraced in a bureaucracy ?
It is not about “doing Agile.” It’s about “being Agile.”

It's about having an Agile mindset - When people in the organization had the right mindset, it hardly mattered what tools, processes and practices they were using, the Agile mindset made things come out right. 

Conversely, if they didn’t have an Agile mindset, it didn’t matter if they were implementing every tool and process and practice exactly according to the book, no benefits flowed. Agile is a mindset.

So the big question is..... Can a beaurocracy have an agile mindset ? 



Thursday, September 8, 2016

Innovation, Not Iteration – How China Overtook Apple and Silicon Valley

Apple’s new iPhone 7 was announced this week. Unlike Jobs-era keynotes, the announcement of this new flagship product was heralded by a long list of iterative changes: slightly lighter, slightly faster, slightly better battery life. 

Only two changes are notable. The first is the removal of the headphone jack, a hotly contested decision.

The second is the addition of a second camera.

It’s a brilliant move. A second camera allows the iPhone 7 to use different focal widths and, better still, the digital simulation of bokeh — the fuzzy background you see in photos taken from DSLR and mirrorless cameras.

This is innovation, driven by a visionary leader.

Unfortunately, that visionary isn’t Apple.


Half a year ago and seven thousand miles from Cupertino, Shenzhen-based phone manufacturer Huawei unveiled their newest smartphone. Crafted in collaboration with Leica, a renowned German camera manufacturer, the Huawei P9 boasted one killer feature: a second camera that could digitally simulate bokeh.

It’s been a long time since China only copied the west. Increasingly, Chinese companies are leading the way, leaving their western counterparts iterating on outdated product roadmaps.


Facebook rolled out mobile payments in 2015. How many people do you know who use it?

WeChat, China’s dominant messenger platform, has had mobile payments and digital fund transfers since 2014. As of 2016, over 200 million monthly active users (1 in 4 of its full user base) regularly WeChat payments. Its use is ubiquitous — for colleagues, restaurants, boutiques, and taxis (which you can also book directly on WeChat).

Facebook launched chatbot integration in 2016, allowing businesses to tap into conversational commerce.

WeChat, once again, forged the path. Chatbots have been available on the Chinese platform since 2013, and adoption is so highly successful today that many Chinese start-ups will create a chatbot for customer service before even hiring customer-facing personnel.

How about integrated commerce? Facebook recognizes the opportunity — but most businesses on Facebook today are forced to use third-party check-out apps. Users can’t actually buy a product without this, and Facebook doesn’t capture any of that value.

WeChat — you guessed it — has had stores and integrated checkout available since 2013.


Industry conventions and the media were once abuzz with cries about China’s “copycat culture”. Today, those complaints are still spoken — but seldom by executives who understand the scope of how far Chinese digital innovation has come.

Their world changed, but ours didn’t.

While western companies can’t benefit from all of China’s advantages (most notably, a population that skipped the desktop-era and is mobile-native), there are lessons to learn. Here are three drivers of China’s digital innovation, and some ways today’s leaders can benefit from them.

Leveraging Competitive Advantage

Michael Porter created the idea of competitive advantage in 1985. Since then, the original idea of “the unique advantage we have over our competitors” has been far too often distilled into “what do we do most often”. Kodak is a prime and often-stated example of this. Failing to recognize that they were in the image-creation business, they neglected the digital camera market and lost all relevancy beyond as a near-bankrupt litigation agent.

Chinese companies, many being established in an environment of constant chaos, haven’t forgotten this. Beijing-based electronics manufacturer Xiaomi released its first smartphone in 2011. They rapidly expanded to phone peripherals, smart home products, drones, apps, and in-app purchases. Intuitively, they understood that their competitive advantage wasn’t in phones — it was the entire digital ecosystem of any and all physical devices. By scaling quickly and establishing themselves in a wide range of products, they created a holistic platform that was able to stake a claim on a vast territory. What once looked to outside observers like a haphazard hodge-podge of imitation has revealed itself to be an incredibly ambitious product vision.

Understanding the Population

The underserved masses offer a huge opportunity — for traditional industries, but especially for digital products. There are hundreds of start-ups that target a small segment of consumers. Need hugs? Nails done? Borrow the right dress? There’s an app for that.

Enterprise-scale products are similarly complicit. From app suites from the telecom industry to mono-brand fashion apps, many companies fail to understand the opportunity that lies in understanding firstly user pain points, and secondly, the size of the untapped market opportunity.

Hangzhou Wahaha Group, the largest beverage producer in China with annual revenues of over 13 billion USD, seized upon this with their launch of Nutri-Express in 2008. Nutri-Express, a combination of milk and juice, addressed a major pain point of a vast swath of China’s under-served population: the need for nutrition and vitamins in an easily consumed, reliable package. Health and nutrition have become an increasingly pressing concern as Chinese consumers become more wealthy. The simple pivot from what was once a producer of unhealthy, sugary drinks to address the newly surfaced needs of consumers yielded vast rewards — over 2.5 billion USD in sales in its first year.

Openness to New Ideas

For years, China has approached the west with a spirit of humility and learning. Executives and managers in China have constantly travelled to the west to learn in both academia and the marketplace. Chinese companies start with proven western models and products in the design stage, but then proceed to rapidly iterate and adapt them for the needs of the Chinese domestic market.

Qihoo 360, a leading Chinese security company, started in 2005 by delivering paid anti-virus software. The characteristics of the Chinese market, however, offered far more value in a freemium model paired with online advertising and gaming. Today, they’ve grown from a start-up to an industry leader with a market cap of over 11 billion USD. 67% percent of revenues are from advertising. Software sales, their original flagship, now make up only 1% of revenues.

How did Chinese companies arrive at this approach to learning from others?

It wasn’t easy.

In the 14th century, Imperial China led the world. Chinese achievements in science, economics, and exploration were unparalleled. They shut themselves off from the world, and failed to learn. Countries that they once viewed as laggards overtook them, culminating in the humiliation of the Opium Wars and the occupation of China by foreign powers.

China never forgot that lesson: a country that believes only in its own exceptionalism becomes blind to learning from the strengths of others.

The parallels with the West of today are clear. The lessons are present. Ultimately, today’s leaders will choose whether to view China’s example as a threat or as an opportuni

Great rules from a 6th Grade Olympiad


I just went to the Parent's Meeting for the Science Olympiad my 6th grade son will be taking part in.  I wish the rules of organizations could look more like the ones we received:

1.  No experience necessary 
2.  Safety and teamwork first 
3.  Everyone must be on time and ready to learn 
4.  Strict adherence to the code of ethics is a requirement 
5. Have fun

They ended with this quote from Albert Einstein:  The most important human endeavor is the striving for morality in our actions...Only morality in our actions can give beauty and dignity to our lives."  Sounded like the groundwork for a great organization...if only!

Best
Deepa 

Google investing in Virtual Reality Films


Hello Ivan

Google is investing hundreds of thousands of dollars apiece in virtual-reality films and programs, part of a plan to line up exclusive content for the debut of its new Daydream service in the coming weeks.

Google will help promote projects from Hulu LLC and fund the production of 360-degree videos with YouTube stars like the Dolan twins and Justine Ezarik. The division of Alphabet Inc. has also partnered with video-game producers and sports leagues to boost its biggest virtual-reality initiative.

The company is relying on apps, shorts and games to promote Daydream, a hybrid store and software service that Google hopes will be the dominant way people engage in virtual reality, much like Android is for smartphones. An update to Android software that will support Daydream began rolling recently. The idea is to encourage the growth of the technology and ensure Google maintains a central role in helping people find things to watch.

VR equipment sales will exceed $1 billion in 2016, reaching $22 billion in 2020.

Google is entering what has quickly become a crowded marketplace, with products from Facebook Inc., Sony Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. and HTC Corp. Whereas Sony’s Morpheus headset is tethered to its PlayStation video-game console, Google is focused on mobile-based VR, whereby consumers snap their phones into a visor or headset. With the headset on, Daydream presents users with an array of apps, from YouTube to HBO Now.

This will definitely help advance mobile virtual reality because mobile virtual reality is what’s going to get the most people to strap things on their head.

While competitors are targeting users willing to spend hundreds of dollars for top-notch VR equipment, mobile will reach mass audiences.

Google’s growing investment in virtual reality tantalizes filmmakers eager for more resources. While Facebook has spent millions of dollars on individual projects, most large media companies have been circumspect about investing too much money in a new storytelling medium with a small audience.

This being Google’s first major virtual-reality content initiative, the company doesn’t want to spend too much just yet and is spreading money around to see what works. Google is spending high six figures on video games, and is offering from low five figures to low six figures for projects with filmmakers and online talent.

Filmmakers working with Google must use a 16-camera rig optimized for the company’s Jump software platform for virtual-reality content. GoPro Inc. is making one, called Odyssey, priced at $15,000. Though a few elite VR filmmakers have either balked at the budgets or the requirement that they use Google’s camera, dozens of filmmakers have signed up to work with YouTube.
 
YouTube won’t demand an ownership stake in the projects filmmakers create with its funds, since the Google division is more interested in encouraging creative people to produce content around the debut of Daydream to stoke awareness and excitement.

YouTube will be one of dozens of apps available within Daydream, alongside HBO’s streaming service, Hulu and apps from sports leagues like the NBA and MLB. Google will co-market some of the programming. Though its projects won’t be exclusive to Daydream, Hulu will time the release of several pieces to the debut of Google’s platform.

Daydream will be introduced around the same time as the release of new Android phones, VR headsets and controllers. The latest version of Android has VR-enhancing features including faster graphics processing, quicker head tracking and better use of data from multiple sensors.

Google had been working on its own headset, but the company has mainly focused on reference designs for headsets, and controllers, for other companies to build their own VR devices. It would rather turn Daydream, known to some as Android VR, into the dominant interface for virtual reality.

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

The missing men of America

Inspired from 
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/the-missing-men/488858/

Around 7-8 million males in the USA have completely dropped out of the workforce over the past 59 years and don’t even want a job — 


Where are they? 
Prison? 
Disability? 
In school?
Stay at home dads ?

None of the above!!!

Research says they do nothing but hang around, socialise and watch TV. 

This is not a good thing!!!!

Where did the jobs go? 

Manufacturing and construction - In 1954, the highwater mark for male participation, the manufacturing and construction sectors accounted for nearly 40 percent of all jobs. Now, after the long decline of manufacturing and the end of the housing bubble, they account for just 13 percent. 

These are jobs that men without a college degree can count on, and they're much rarer than they used to be. The White House report notes that "when the share of state employment attributable to construction, mining and to a lesser extent manufacturing are higher, more prime-age men participate in the labor force.” In other words, men are more likely to work in areas where the state directly subsidizes employment in male-heavy occupations.

There are four occupations expected to add more than 100,000 jobs in the next decade: personal care aides, home health aides, medical secretaries, and marketing specialists -( but these are more female dominated)

Perhaps the United States needs some sort of massive national building project to put these men back to work in jobs that they would be proud and willing to do
Several weeks ago, Conor Sen, a portfolio manager and a columnist at Bloomberg View, wrote a widely shared essay predicting that housing would become the dominant economic story of the next five years.

The problem - construction needs to be made in metro and high growth areas ..... And unemployed men are in Appalachia, the Rust Belt, and the Deep South, where the rate of non-working men often hovers around 40 percent.

The challenge - how to get these unemployed men to move to areas which need construction?  ....... 


And even more challenging .... How can we upskill these humans? Maybe through a programme of lifelong learning . If they are watching tv, how can we pique their interest and upskill them?

Defining Blockchain


 Hello i4j friends,
As state and federal legislation of or involving blockchain technologies becomes more common, the question is arising: what is the definition of blockchain for purposes of statute and regulation? 
There are multiple views and drafts of potential definitions being circulated.  In light of our recent innovation definition discussion, I thought that maybe some of you would be interested in joining an open public forum to share your ideas, questions and specific proposals for legislative language defining Blockchain as part of an online participatory process and an in-person discussion to be held at the US House of Representatives https://law.mit.edu/Blockchain-Legislative-Definition  
Fintech is being driven by two major innovations – blockchain and distributed ledgers. I do believe that this is part of the digital future for the financial sector and understanding how the industry is changing is of critical importance. It will transform how financial transactions are recorded, reconciled and reported. Accordingly, it is going to be important to understand the skills, infrastructure and vision needed for blockchain and virtual ledgers.
I’m helping organize a Blockchain event at the MIT Media Lab on Sept. 13th link: https://law.mit.edu/blog/the-great-blockchain-bakeoff-of-2016  If any of you are interested, please just let me know. The Blockchain piece is part of the Electronic Transaction Association’s larger event that day but I think the Blockchain piece is important because it is reflective of an understanding that this is a methodology that can facilitate new processes and architecture that will make digital settlement more efficient and be a part of the new economy we all strive for, and for which the definition of Blockchain will be important.
Blockchain Definition Links: Use THIS FORM to contribute to the process and you can follow the progress, as it develops, on GitHub in this public repository: https://github.com/LegalCode/Blockchain
Cheers,
Amy
--