Nexttech

Nexttech
Creating Generational Legacies

Thursday, February 28, 2019

Can Corporates and Startups co-exist?

Great article by Andrew Campbell 



Why is it so hard to achieve innovative outcomes with Startups in a corporate environment? How do you bring a large corporate and a small Startup together to create value?

When it comes to bridging the gap between large corporates and Startups, Slingshot are at the coalface. We’ve run corporate accelerator programs for the NRMA, HCF, ING Direct & Simplot and have worked with over 50 Startups to help them engage with our corporate partners.

However, it is not easy. In this article I share some of the lessons learned along the way, discuss some specific problems we've encountered and outline some of the solutions we've found.

Benefits and value of working together

By working with Startups, a large corporate gets access to a whole ecosystem of innovation. They can crowd-source ideas, get insight into innovative trends and access to high growth investment options.  For more on these benefits see my previous post - /http://www.linkedin.com/pulse/3-reasons-corporates-want-work-startups-andrew-campbell?trk=mp-author-card

 As for Startups, they get access to the two things they need the most; customers and capital. They also get the validation that comes from working with a large corporate partner. 

The problem(s)

The problems are many and varied but stem from the fact that that Startups and corporates are extremely different organisations at opposite ends of the business life cycle. Corporates have tens of thousands of employees and Startups have three. Corporates generally have a large operation with highly specialised employees, whereas Startup founders have to be generalists and cover a variety of roles.

The graphic above shows how these differences play out across four important areas. I've chosen these areas because when trying to bring corporates and Startups together, they come up time and time again. The common theme is that they create barriers to achieving outcomes.

Solutions

Here are the solutions that we've come up with to overcome these problems and achieve commercial deals and investment outcomes for our corporate clients and Startup businesses. 

Language and Thinking - Lean Canvas

A great starting point to create a common understanding and bring people together is a framework created by Ash Maurya called the Lean Canvas. Ash is a Slingshot Mentor and is personally involved in every program we run. Creating a Lean Canvas is a simple process that involves identifying a specific customer segment, understanding their problems, defining a unique value proposition and ensuring that a business model can be wrapped around it all.

Simple but not easy, as it involves speaking to customers and generating insight. However, that's the solution we've found works best. Expose relevant corporate staff to the Lean Canvas method and teach them how to use this powerful framework. The feedback is always positive and it goes a long way to creating a common understanding.

We also invest time with Startups to help them understand corporate thinking and processes, but by far the best outcomes are achieved by having corporates think more like Startups not the other way around. After all, the world probably doesn't need more corporate thinking. 

Decision Making - Minimum Success Criteria & Key Metrics
Decision making is a crucial area if you're trying to achieve outcomes and a point of failure if you don't get it right. A method we've had success with is to apply a minimum success criteria (MSC) to decision making.

A MSC (another of Ash Maurya's concepts) forces people to think of the lowest level of achievement for a project that they would still count as a success. This is not as easy as it sounds and the process can be challenging for participants.

The reality is that a MSC is very different from business case thinking or Big Hairy Audacious Goal thinking. It's crucial however, because it gives you something hard and concrete to anchor decision making to. 

The next step is to build out the Key Metrics that will get you to your definition of success, then test them for validity. Which brings us to the next solution that helps to bridge the divide. 

Risk - Experiments

We routinely teach experiment methods to Startup founders to save them from wasting years of their lives and investor capital building something that no-one wants. In a corporate environment, experiments also work really well to reduce risk and validate assumptions.

We've recently helped a corporate client save $15m through a simple two-week experiment that proved customers didn't want the product that they were going to build.

To bring corporates and Startups together, you need to reduce risk and support decision making. Low cost, rapidly deployed experiments do this really well. 

People - Engagement, Alignment & Buy-in

The most complex piece of a complicated puzzle. In order to build successful innovative products and businesses, we have had to overcome corporate inertia caused by misalignment of culture, incentives and agendas. One of the ways we have achieved this has been to create our own corporate engagement process.

To start, we explore the mutual objectives of a Startup and the relevant stakeholders in the corporate. Then we identify areas of alignment or misalignment. Then when moving towards a trial we deliberately identify obstacles and where possible avoid, or overcome them.

If we come across intractable misalignment we advise both parties to end the engagement quickly to minimise the time investment.

Even when it doesn’t result in an outcome, this process of engaging with Startups leads to internal insight for our corporate partners. What often follows is the modification of incentive structures and KPIs, leadership development and culture change. When this activity is continued for several cycles over two to three years, the insight and outcomes ultimately result in genuine corporate transformation. 

Summary

The challenges involved in bringing Startups and corporates together for mutual benefit are complex and multi-faceted. However, they are not completely intractable and can be solved with perseverance, insight and the right methods. Solving these problems, creates significant commercial value. Corporates gain an edge on their existing operations, access revenue from new products and over time transform their businesses. Startups get immediate access to customers, funding and validation. The accelerator programs we run at Slingshot, enable both parties to achieve these outcomes faster, accelerating business development, saving years and creating competitive advantage.

To see this post and other useful resources that relate to startups and corporate innovation, visit: 

http://www.slingshotters.com/corporate-innovation/solve-startup-corporate-engagement-problems

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

5G will be the backbone of our future communication infrastructure




The 5G rollout is a big deal, with 3 main competitors in the race.


Nokia, Ericsson and Huawei are the main competitors, with Huawei currently having a significant lead in the 5G technology race 


Nokia’s CEO Rajeev Suri said that 5G ecosystem is expected to deliver 25 times faster speed of 1 gigabit per second compared to 4G, and with the roll out of the next generation technology by 2021, security and reliability will be a top priority for businesses.


Million of trade secrets will flow on the network . Enterprises and Governments will rely on operators for providing the network for critical functions. Essential trade secrets will flow over those networks


The 5G speed will enable the  Internet of Things which will be a key driver drive in 5G business enabling productivity growth to historical levels.


According to a Nokia Bell lab study, business opportunity for telecom from 5G technology is expected to double from USD 500 billion to USD 1 trillion by 2028, and double again in the next 5 years. 


Governments and enterprises will rely on operators for providing network for critical functions (as they have done from 4G, 3G and telcos over the past 100 years! 


We all agree that ethics and security cannot be compromised, 


Suri quite rightly says that cheaper is not always better. Better is better. When it comes to network security, better really matters - the question is..... 


Many countries are banning Huawei citing security concerns.


The questions to ask are 


  • Is Huawei the best? 
  • Is the Huawei ban based on the trade war - or are potential security breeches a valid concern? 
  • Is it not the Telcos that one should worry about re potential security breeches and not the infrastructure suppliers?
  • Should a country rely on one infrastructure supplier or more? 


All interesting questions! 





Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Jumping Jive and some of the best dancing in 1943

Fred Astaire said it was ‘the greatest dancing he had ever seen on film’. In a dance performance for the ages, the Nicholas Brothers, Fayard (1914–2006) and Harold (1921–2000), dazzled audiences with their acrobatic routine to Cab Calloway’s hit song, Jumpin’ Jive. Not only that, but the routine was unrehearsed and what you see was the first take! [source
The performance was from the 1943 musical film, Stormy Weather.



Monday, February 11, 2019

Agile vs KANBAN - what’s the difference



What's is Agile?




Agile methodology is a practice which promotes continuous iteration of development and testing throughout SDLC life-cycle. Agile is alternative to a waterfall or traditional sequential development. It is ideal process for those who want to work with continuous feedback. 

It is a process in which requirement evolve and change. The primary object of each iteration is to comes with a working product. 

In an Agile approach, the leadership will encourage teamwork and direct communication. Here, stakeholders and developers should work simultaneously to align the product to match up their customer requirement and organization goals. 

What is Kanban?




Kanban process is nothing but a Board, which is called "Kanban Board." This board plays a vital role in displaying the task workflow. It helps to optimize the flow of task between different teams. It is a method for defining, managing and improving services for delivering knowledge work. 

In this method, work items are printed visually. It allows team members to see the state of every piece of work at every development stage. Moreover, a team member gets overview who's doing what and can identify and eliminate problem areas in the process. 

Kanban methodology allows reprioritizing work as per the need of stakeholders. As work moves from one state to another, some extra work also added until the flow is steady. The team collaborates with each other to improve the flow of work throughout the project. Kanban process is never restricted to set process and defined sprints. So, it offers flexibility for developers. 

Agile Principles

  • The goal is set to satisfy the customer by offering continuous delivery of software.
  • It always welcomes changes even during later stages. 
  • Deliver working system from 15 days to one month, with a purpose to limit the timescale.
  • Business stakeholders and development team will work daily until the project is over. 
  • Working software is elementary in Agile Process
  • Agile software development approach promotes sustainable development. 
  • Give complete attention to technical expertise 

Kanban Principles

  • Kanban process visualizes the workflow which is easy to understand. 
  • Encourage acts of leadership at all levels
  • It helps to measure and improve Collaboration 
  • Respect the current process, roles & responsibilities 
  • Helps team to make process easy and explicit
Here is a link to a table of differences by guru 99 https://www.guru99.com/agile-vs-kanban.html

Below are some videos explaining 











Friday, February 1, 2019

From sewage and compost to viable fuel

An Environmental Problem 




To halt climate change, the UN has said "unprecedented change" will be required in all aspects of society , both on a social and on a global level 


Fossil fuels on our environment is a big deal!


The European Commision has pledged that the EU will cut greenhouse gas emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.


Our future and the future of our grandchildren are dependent on us to make this change 


A solution - faecal fuel 




Spanish company Ingelia has developed a biocarbon fuel called biochar - made using sewage, as a much cleaner energy source to traditional coal.


Biochar burns like coal but the actual production is carbon neutral - and it has a considerably lower production of harmful wastes such as nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine.


By turning organic waste into a biocarbon that doesn't emit CO2 or other pollutants when produced, Ingelia may have just found a much more sustainable energy source than traditional coal.

How they do it 




Ingelia treats waste matter such as sewage with high pressure and heat to produce its biochar fuel.


"We use the organic collection of trash, the organic portion of municipal waste, sewage from treatment plants, and even waste from gardening. We take this waste and unfer specific pressure and temperature conditions, 20 bars and 200ºC, we dehydrate the organic matter and siphon off the humid matter in liquid form," explained the CEO Maria  Hernandez 


 "In other words, we concentrate 95% of the carbon in the waste."


During Ingelia's thermochemical conversion process (known as hydrothermal carbonisation), harmful wastes such as nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine are, for the most part, siphoned off in the residual liquid.


The result, after an eight-hour process, is a solid, dry, cylindrical material that could replace fossil-derived carbon fuel.


The bad smells produced as a byproduct of the composting process are avoided by containing the treatment of the waste matter in a closed tank, allowing plants to be situated closer to population centres.


"It has the same calorific value and combustion structure," said Hernández. She added: "Compared with a standard composting or a biogas plant where the process takes around 30 days, the timescale for our method is as little as eight hours."

The founder - Maria Hernandez



From small beginnings in Valencia to international expansion. 

Hernández' determination earned the Ingelia co-founder and CEO a nomination in the Women's category for the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) awards, presented earlier this month at its annual conference in Budapest.


International Expansion 

Ingelia has already outsourced this process to their waste plants in Spain, the UK and Italy. In fact, Italy's largest sewage manager has also implemented the process in their Tuscany plant where they treat 80,000 tons of sewage per year and the Belgian town of Oostende too is set to have a plant that treats 20,000 tons of organic waste matter with four reactors.

Hernández said their cleaner fuel could replace 220,000 tons of coal per year by 2022.

Financials 

Last year the company had sales  of $2.29 million and is looking to raise $3.44 million.


Projections are  $28.4 million in turnover next year and up to $107 million for 2022.


Hernández added that her company is currently in negotiations with the majority of waste management companies in Spain.

Uses of Biochar 


It could be used to work batteries, or even to produce specific materials such as biopolymers, possibly for producing plastics or perhaps as substitutes for peat in soil


Environmental Impact

Maria enthusiastically shares with us her 2022 vision


"With our process, by 2022 we'd be able to replace 220,000 tons of coal per year and avoid the emission of half a million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere," adding that the company was planning to capture 3% of the European waste management market.


Source Business Insider España. Copyright 2018.